According to "John Titor" in Episode 2, even if you go back in time and kill your own grandfather, you would continue to exist, because the you that killed your grandfather comes from a world line where your grandfather wasn't murdered.

In the last episode, after they save Kurisu, Suzuha is returned to the future, because in the Steins Gate timeline the time machine is never created, so she can't come to the past. But doesn't this violate her explanation of the Grandfather Paradox? Since according to her explanation, she'd remain in the present, instead of returning to the future.

  • Yeah, these time-travel shows scare me. If I had to guess, the only thing that matters is which of the timelines the focus of the show follows. Obviously it hops from timeline to timeline with each jump.
    – Mysticial
    Feb 1, 2013 at 1:25
  • because in the Steins Gate timeline the time machine is never created, so she can't come to the past Where is that stated? Maybe it's because of the sub, but if I'm not mistaken, she just wants to go back.
    – looper
    Feb 2, 2013 at 16:25
  • @looper There's no reason to create the time machine in that timeline, because the events that lead to it's creation never occurred.
    – кяαzєя
    Feb 2, 2013 at 17:29
  • @Krazer: But still, I don't see that she needs to go back.
    – looper
    Feb 2, 2013 at 18:03
  • 1
    Wait, John Titor? Now I really want to watch this show. :) Feb 5, 2013 at 14:55

1 Answer 1


This is how John Titor sums up the Grandfather Paradox and its effects in the Steins;Gate universe (from the episode 2 English dub):

Someone else: Aren't you worried that by being here you're creating some kind of a paradox?

John Titor: Ah, the so-called "Grandfather Paradox"? It doesn't exist. It's possible to meet your past self. You'll simply change world lines if you do.

The anime doesn't really touch on it; the details of the time machines that John Titor uses are not really revealed. They're touched upon by the mechanics of the show, but never detailed in dialog, which could lead us to assume that this is a plot hole. As someone else put it, "The wrong explanation ... probably makes more sense on the surface than what the truth is."[1]

However, the Steins;Gate visual novel goes a bit more in-depth. Firstly, Titor explains that these events make perfect sense:

"Cause and effect will be reconfigured. The me sitting here will disappear, since I'd probably be living peacefully in 2036." – Suzuha

Additionally, Okarin determines a bit more about the mechanics of the time travel:

By the way, about what will happen if I meet the "me" that already returned once-- in other words, the me that stabbed Kurisu to death, I already asked Suzuha beforehand.

The conclusion is that "we won't meet."

The world line where I already killed Kurisu is minutely different from where we're time traveling to.

Meaning time travel slightly changes the world line divergence ratio.

Though of course, that value is still within the error range of the attractor field, so it can't make any concrete changes.

In my opinion, this explanation is a bit wishy-washy, but it's canon; essentially, he's saying:

Using the time machine creates a slightly different world line, so there will not be conflicts in repeated time travel attempts. (It "overwrites" the previous attempt.) But then, the two world lines merge within the attractor field again.

In essence, we can more-or-less explain the events (using one last spoiler tag) in the following way:

Suzuha disappeared because, even though she existed on a slightly separated world line, when she traveled back to the future, the two lines would again merge and her existence would be overwritten by the Steins Gate world line.

I would conclude, then, that the events that took place in the last episode do not violate the Grandfather Paradox. There is sufficient evidence to show that the world line's future has been altered in such a way as to justify the events.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .